22:19, 19 maiatza 2018ko berrikusketa aldatu Theklan (eztabaida \| ekarpenak) Burokratak, Interfazeko administratzaileak, Administratzaileak 408.198 edits No edit summary Etiketa: 2017 wikitestu editorearekin ← Aurreko ezberdintasuna		22:22, 19 maiatza 2018ko berrikusketa aldatu desegin Theklan (eztabaida \| ekarpenak) Burokratak, Interfazeko administratzaileak, Administratzaileak 408.198 edits No edit summary Etiketa: 2017 wikitestu editorearekin Hurrengo ezberdintasuna →
1. lerroa: {{PAGEBANNER:Archiver's Barnstar.jpg\|origin=0,0}} {{lanean}} Hemen daukazuena '''Wikipediako artikuluen kalitatea neurtzeko''' sistema bat da. Sistema honek aukera ematen digu artikulu batek izan duen garapena neurtzeko, kalitate irizpide ezberdinen arabera. Wikipedian ditugun artikuluek sakontasun maila ezberdina izan dezakete. Artikulurik onenek [[Fitxategi:Cscr-featured.svg\|14px]] ikonoa izaten dute eta [[Wikipedia:Bozketak/Artikulu_nabarmenduak\|bozketa bidez aukeratzen ditu komunitateak]]. Beste artikulu batzuk, ordea, [[Fitxategi:Puzzle_stub.svg\|14px]] zirriborroak baino ez dira, artikulu bat izan daitekeenaren egitura minimoa. Tartean, mota guztietako artikuluak daude. Orrialde honen helburua neurketa sistema bat eskaintzea da. == ~~Grades~~Mailak ==▼ The following system is used by the [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team]] for assessing how close we are to a distribution-quality article on a particular topic. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though [[WP:MOS\|language quality]] and [[WP:Layout\|layout]] are also factors. Once an article reaches the {{nowrap\|1=<span style="background-color:cyan;">'''A-Class'''</span>[[File:Symbol_a_class.svg\|20px]]}}, it is considered "complete", although edits will continue to be made. The quality assessments are mainly performed by members of [[Wikipedia:WikiProjects\|WikiProjects]], who tag talk pages of articles. These tags are then [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index\|collected by a bot]], which generates output such as a [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles by quality log\|log]] and [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles by quality statistics\|statistics]]. For more information, see ''[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot\|Using the bot]]''. (Note that when more than one WikiProject has rated an article, the bot will take the best rating as the rating of the overall article.) The WP:1.0 team is now setting up to use a ''second'' bot to select articles, based on the assessments performed by WikiProjects. ~~Two levels, GA ("Good Article") and FA ("Featured Article"), are assessments made by external panels, rather than by Wikiprojects.~~ ~~Candidates are nominated by listing them at ''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations\|Good article nominations]]'' and ''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\|Featured article candidates]]''.~~ ~~Judgments are made according to the criteria at ''[[Wikipedia:What is a good article?\|What is a good article?]]'' and ''[[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria\|Featured article criteria]]'', and the~~ ~~results are listed at ''[[Wikipedia:Good articles\|Good articles]]'' and ''[[Wikipedia:Featured articles\|Featured articles]]''.~~ It is vital that editors not take these assessments of their contributions personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment#Quality_scale\|this]]. Many projects have an [[:Category:WikiProject assessments\|assessment team]]. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment. At present this assessment system is in use in the Wikipedia 1.0 project, and in several hundred WikiProjects on the English Wikipedia. As of May 2017, over 5.1 million articles have been assessed. Several other languages are also using this assessment system or a derivative thereof. There is a [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Importance_of_topic\|separate scale for rating articles for ''importance'' or ''priority'']], which is unrelated to the ''quality'' scale outlined here. Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope. See also a proposed template at {{tl\|Importance Scheme}} ▲== Grades == ~~{{anchor\|Quality scale}}~~ {{Grading scheme}}

Wikipedia:Kalitate neurketa: berrikuspenen arteko aldeak